The Myth of African Poverty

There is a great fallacy, a lie perpetuated through history and around the globe: that Africa is poor.

Africa is presented as poor, because it doesn’t have any of this strange folding stuff called money. It has plenty of everything else, it is what capitalists and prospectors call resource rich.

Indeed, it is the most perfect place to grow our tea, coffee, cocoa… fruit, vegetables, flowers… and harvest our rubber, hardwood… oil… jewels, minerals… It’s enough to destabilise governments for!

We then offer them some of this folding stuff and they fall back into line. And lie and cheat and steal all the way from the top down, so this paltry representation of real value never gets anywhere near those who work the land or were driven off it. Yet because the dispossessed were duped with the concepts of land ownership and hierarchical authority (and violence), they feel disempowered and they too have fallen under the spell of this strange stuff called money.

Africa has never been poor. It has a history and wealth of diversity unequalled. And further, if we are to believe our anthropologists and geneticists, the very birthplace of humanity. Surprising then, is it not, that while in Western Europe and North America we’ve decimated the forests, worn out the soil, polluted the rivers and water tables and exhausted the mines, Africa remains, to the large part, thriving and fruitful. A godsend to Western governments with stomachs to fill, corporations with consumers to satisfy and banks with interest to manufacture.

Africa’s Western educated, financed, supported, armed leaders remain happy to perpetuate this myth, too ignorant or seduced to wish any change in perception: preferring the enormous power and the largely unsupervised bankroll. Corruption further suits Western interests: favouring personal/tribal associates, backhanders, etc. creating resentment, division, tension and potential conflict.

Manufacturing and maintaining divisions is a tactic that dates back two and a half millennia. More recent however is the lucrative and thriving arms industry, the UK’s only remaining indigenous industry, which reaps the benefit of internal repression and maintaining fictitious borders – while banks, merchants and Western governments profit from the extraordinary value such power hungry individuals place on violence, and how little value they place on basic foodstuffs.

Again, we find this strange folding stuff valuing the most useless and dangerous commodities with enormous worth, although they have no practical purpose, while basic nourishment, God’s gifts and harvesting, are valued as virtually worthless (one should however note, upon reaching Western supermarkets their value will have multiplied many, many times).

So we find the impossible situation, where the richest place on earth is labelled poorest, continues to haemorrhage genuine wealth, while being kept enslaved and divided through arbitrary concepts and artificial boundaries, turning tribe against tribe and hoodwinking the people with the lie of money.

Advertisements

Unholy Knights of the Red Shield

Unholy Knights of the Red Shield

The Rothschilds, we speak of them often and many don’t really know who and what they are. Sometimes one wonders whether there is some fable behind the shadowy crest that is the “Red Shield,” for which the families name is derived. Thoughts of mystery or some other novelty told to children around bed time, meant to keep them in bed, covers drawn over their faces. The Rothschilds are that wicked Cabal that forms the pupil in the eye on top of the pyramid. They are the dearth of humanity, fattened by greed and full of lust, destroying what little hopes humanity has for independence. Unlike the state sponsored education you’ve come from, here we practice reality in all its glorious horrors. During this Journey you won’t be fed the traditional rotten meat of fictitious fables, formed from the pens of perverted historical prostitutes. But instead have your eyes opened as history is rewritten to reflect what really happened as opposed to the bed time story you’ve come to know. It is not the premise of the author or this article to play to the status quo. We will delve and dive head long into revisionist history or more aptly put, return the facts back to their proper places. Let the journey begin

Lucifer Rising, time to answer the who and what that makes up the Rothschilds. To begin, we must first dispel with the claim that they are Jewish, this is important for two reasons: the first to show that their critics are not evil “Anti-Semites” and second to remove any historical ties to Ancient Judaism. It’s not important to show any religion at all with regards to the family, but if one is needed Luciferianism would be its name. Many look to the Star of David and falsely ascribe Hitler as its creator, however the story goes much deeper. Mayer Amschel Bauer (Rothschilds Patriarch) aka Mayer Amschel Rothschilds revived it, not out of thin air, but from a careful study of the Occult practices he followed. In the Bible the Star can be found in the worship of the dancing Israelites as Moses came down from the mount with the first set of Ten Commandants, this account is detailed in the book of Amos. That not being enough, we see it explained and named in the book of Acts, where it‘s called Remphan, an Egyptian god, also worshiped by other religions as the god Saturn. Pagan history aside, we see that what calls itself Jewish is not, its formation was in Egypt and probably even earlier (Straightway Truth). To further the divorcement of Rothschilds and “Jew“ we now go to the genetic proof: The Rothschilds claim to Jewish blood is also a myth. The explanation of which will take us to 9th century Turkey were we meet King Bulon of the Khazars. The King had a unique problem, he was surrounded by Muslims on one side and Christians on the other. This presented a huge issue for the king, as he rightly suspected invasion due to the lack of affiliation with either. His answer to this issue was to give his empire an identity that would protect it from the outside worlds interests. The solution came in the form of Judaism as it was determined that the Jews were able to deal well with both Muslim and Christian. From this conversion the Ashkenazi Jew was born (IM NIN’ALU). So now we come back to our illustrious Rothschilds, which are the posterity of this marriage of necessity. The important thing here to remember is that Jewishness of this family is a cover and it always has been.

Money Pit, fractional banking is what makes the Rothschilds world go round. It is the staple of debt creation and has afforded them the power to take down entire countries. This may sound odd, but something as simple as having an initial reserve of precious metal i.e. Gold or Silver and then attributing value to worthless paper that is supposedly represented by precious metal. On the surface this appears to be viable, as it would negate the necessity of caring around all that heavy metal; the problem happens when you start loaning out money for which there is no backing and then continue to do so with complete abandonment. This system of finance is what the Rothschilds have perfected. The idea for such a system is not their invention, and probably has its roots in the Templars, who used it as a means to gain wealth and power themselves throughout Europe. How Rothschild wields his way into the courts of Europe is not important, it is however worth noting that he did perfect the Government Loan and use this as the base for the creation of his initial wealth (Hitchcock).

Spies like us, Napoleon, Wellington, and the take over of Britain are the next phase of the growth of the family. Now without going to much into the battle at Waterloo itself it is important to note that through its interests in Europe the Rothschilds had developed the first intelligence agency and through a system of fast ships and couriers had created a mechanism for moving information at incredible speed. What happens next is the biggest case of market manipulation in history. The Rothschilds had already funded both sides of the War, Nathan Rothschilds funded Wellington in England and Jacob Rothschilds saw to Napoleon‘s needs in France. So they were going to win either way with this War, what makes this unique is that using the courier system they had in place Nathan Rothschilds was able to get the results of the battle before Wellington‘s own couriers could bring news of his victory over Napoleon. The significance here is that through this information Nathan began to sell Bonds (called Consuls at the time) seeing as everyone knew Rothschilds to be shrewd and have good inside information they assumed Wellington had lost the battle and began selling there bonds at near Pence on the Pound. When there was sufficient amount of bonds on the table Nathan made his move and bought them all up for nearly nothing. When news arrived the next day of Wellington‘s victory it was too late Nathan’s financial coup had already been complete, he now controlled the wealth of England for all intents and purposes (Hitchcock).

Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, Fascism & Communism two birds of a feather that the Rothschilds tied together. The Rothschilds created Fascism from the writings of Nietzsche. And at the same time Marx (real name Moses Levy Mordecai) was drafting the writings of Communism both funded by the Rothschilds, for the sole purpose of creating a dialectic (Hitchcock). This was the same plan to destroy religion and politics put forward by Adam Weishaupt in 1776 (also a Rothschild plant), but thwarted by the German Government in 1785 when the Illuminati was disbanded. It is at this time that Gutle Rothschild states before her death that, “If my sons did not want wars, there would be none” (of note Gutle is the patriarchal mother of the Rothschilds). It is with this knowledge that we must accept the fate of this world. No one can make statements like these without some form of knowledge to back it up. Mayer Rothschilds had some years back been kicked out of Russia by the Tzar and vowed revenge and now after his death his sons where bringing his threat to life. Just like with Wellington and Napoleon, both Communism and Fascism were funded to bring about the necessary boiling point needed for war (Hitchcock). And wars they created just like the currencies that now paid for them they were numbers created on a ledger. There was no real reason for them, the boundaries and catalysts that forged these conflicts where figments of the imaginations of the House of Rothschild. Every war since Napoleon can be traced back to an origin with a Rothschild name on it. Its not feasible without the need for many, many more pages to add the supporting material to substantiate and catalog these occurrences, but having known the scope of this undertaking before it was begun it was decided to supply the necessary reference material needed to complete the task of further investigation on ones own.

Planes, Trains, & Automobiles, everybody loves a monopoly right? Well this is a staple of the Rothschilds business ethic. Why divide and conquer in a true free market, when you can coheres and subvert the whole thing for yourself and take all the profits. This could go on and on like the previous section so for the sake of space and time we will look at Standard Oil, owned by the American arm of Rothschildss, our good friends the Rockefellers. These families are all intermarried and use this to cover their wealth and their name as to hedge suspicions of their monopolistic control. John D. Rockefeller, through his banking connections to the Rothschildss in Europe buys up all the competition and sets up the first monopoly in the United States (Hitchcock). What’s of note here is that the money doesn’t actually exist, the real desire of these families and their agents is not to empty your accounts, they already own those, but to take real property with the artificial money they’ve created. So in the end what was merely entries on a sheet of paper has through hypothecated slide of hand been turned into real assets. Estates, land, and utilities are all in the control of one of the Rothschildss front companies or an agent acting on their behalf.

Sex, Lies, & Video Tape, no financial takeover is complete without a political one. Soon after they there Bank set up they begin to seek out like minded people to further their cause on their behalf. Now most people have some sense of decency and as such sometimes a little persuasion is required to get the right results. When a particular Bill or other important legislation needed to be passed it was the job of agents to provide the necessary incentives for the votes they needed. If a politician could not be bought outright a little prostitution or blackmail goes a long ways to getting quick results. One such case of this is with Woodrow Wilson who has an extra marital affair and is coerced by Samuel Untermyer for the sum of 40,000 Dollars which was to be paid to the woman he slept with. Wilson didn’t have the money and Mr. Untermyer offered to pay the sum from his own pocket, which most certainly sealed the deal for any and all actions needed of the President for which a seat on the Supreme Court was sought (Hitchcock). Once again the recipe here was all part of the original Weishaupt formula back in 1776.

Weishaupt‘s full symphony of destruction reads like this:

1) Use monetary and sex bribery to obtain control of men already in high places, in the various levels of all governments and other fields of endeavor. Once influential persons had fallen for the lies, deceits, and temptations of the Illuminati they were to be held in bondage by application of political and other forms of blackmail, threats of financial ruin, public exposure, and fiscal harm, even death to themselves and loved members of their families.

2) The faculties of colleges and universities were to cultivate students possessing exceptional mental ability belonging to well-bred families with international leanings, and recommend them for special training in internationalism, or rather the notion that only a one-world government can put an end to recurring wars and strife. Such training was to be provided by granting scholarships to those selected by the Illuminati.

3) All influential people trapped into coming under the control of the Illuminati, plus the students who had been specially educated and trained, were to be used as agents and placed behind the scenes of all governments as experts and specialists. This was so they would advise the top executives to adopt policies which would in the long-run serve the secret plans of the Illuminati one-world conspiracy and bring about the destruction of the governments and religions they were elected or appointed to serve.

4) To obtain absolute-control of the press, at that time the only mass-communications media which distributed information to the public, so that all news and information could be slanted in order to make the masses believe that a one-world government is the only solution to our many and varied problems.

These official ingredients for subversion read off like something Orewll would have written if he had spent the time to explain how Big Brother came into being (Hitchcock).

Wag the Dog, no true takeover can be complete without the media right? Ever since Marlon Brando went on Larry King and said the Jews run Hollywood, people have wondered. Well media as well as entertainment is all part of the package and as such is in need of mention. Enter the Council on Foreign Relations created by the Rothschilds in France at Hotel Majestic and put together by Jacob Schiff in 1921 with a 1000 members made up of bankers and heads of industry and executed Colonel Edward Mandell House (Hitchcock). The CRF was than tasked with financially supporting those whose position matched their own for any office in the U.S. Government. It was decided that in order to further there efforts and contain information from the public eye newspapers and other forms of media should be acquired. This task was divided up between other powerful and influential Ashkenazi Jews of the time like: Kuhn Loeb, Goldman Sachs, the Warburgs, and the Lehmanns (Hitchock).

Happily Never After, The point of this essay was to introduce the reader to Zionism indirectly and attribute that term to its proper parent, the Rothschildss. One can not overlook the Cabalism in this families history, its the linchpin to the Occult nature of the family and probably supports the premise of its Zionistic goals for the start. These are the authors suppositions and not that of any of the sources. But since so much of modern Judaism is based on Cabala, the Talmud having already long since denounced the traditional Jewish Torah in favor of its own law. It wouldn’t be to ambitious to claim the precepts of the aforementioned belief system to be the hallmark of its thoughts and actions. The Rothschilds through birthright adopted an Occult religion, founded on the mysteries of Babylon and Egypt and through its teachings fomented a system from which with to take over the world. It has hijacked a religion for the sake of concealing another, all along claiming to be a disenfranchised party deserving protection and sympathy. It‘s a grand hoax from a Grand Lodge and one that has been played out for over a hundred years. In closing lets look at a direct quote from the Jewish Encyclopedia from 1925 it states of the existence of Ashkenazi Jews (who represent approximately 90% of so-called world Jewry), with the startling admission that the so called enemy of the Jews, Esau (also known as Edom, see Genesis 36:1), now actually represents the Jewish race, when on page 42 of Volume V it is stated, “Edom is in modern Jewry.” So what they’re basically saying is that these Ashkenazi Jews, who represent 90% of the so-called Jewish population, are actually gentiles or goyim themselves.

Works Cited
The History of the House of Rothschild. 15 Dec. 2005. The French Connection. 30 Sep. 2007
<http://iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschilds.htm&gt;.

The Khazars. 26 Apr. 2002. IM NIN’ALU. 30 Sep. 2007
<http://www.imninalu.net/Khazars.htm&gt;.

The Star of Remphan. 24 Feb. 2007. StraitwayTruth.com. 30 Sep. 2007
<http://www.straitwaytruth.com/artman/publish/article_44.shtml&gt;.

Thomas Jefferson’s Vision of Independence

By Mifune
Conspiracy Central Blog
September 8, 2007

Thomas Jefferson’s Vision of Independence

Learning and thinking about the life of Thomas Jefferson, I have come into a greater appreciation of the influence of his philosophy upon America as well as the world. While I understand that Jefferson is by no means a perfect man, I still take him as a role model.

The year was 1826. Thomas Jefferson, designing his final will, wrote the following words for his Epitaph:

“Here was buried Thomas Jefferson Author of the Declaration of American Independence Of the Statute of Virginia for religious freedom & Father of the University of Virginia.”

It is important to note that while overlooking his eight years as President of the United States, Jefferson saw as his greatest achievement the most complete expression of John Locke’s concept of natural rights as any nation or people had yet undertaken: independence, life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, religious freedom, and the value of education, allowing people the freedom and opportunity to author their own souls. The United States of America that exists today would not have existed but for the vision and guidance of Thomas Jefferson.

Thomas Jefferson was a very learned man; a scholar by all accounts. As a student, he would spend fifteen hours a day studying. Introduced early on to the writings and concepts of the British Empiricists John Locke, Francis Bacon, and Sir Isaac Newton, he regarded them as the “three greatest men the world had ever produced.”(Peterson, p. 1236) Jefferson often attended dinner parties at the mansion of the royal governor Francis Fauquier. Here Jefferson learned about the philosophy of the leading thinkers of the day; the Enlightenment philosophy of Rousseau and Voltaire. It was this exposure to the most learned minds of his day that led Jefferson to develop his own vision regarding independence.

In 1776, Thomas Jefferson famously wrote the Declaration of Independence, stating:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. …”

“That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” (Wikipedia.com, 2007)

Jefferson’s Republican vision for America was not always a certainty. While Jefferson was a prominent voice in favor of independence as early as 1774, when he wrote A Summary View of the Rights of British America, and in 1776 when he penned the Declaration of Independence, his vision of a limited government clashed with that of the Federalists such as John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, and Aaron Burr. Serving as the Secretary of State during George Washington’s first term, Jefferson fought with the Federalists over whether the United States should have a strong central government, or a government that reserves most of its power to the states. The Federalists eventually won Washington’s favor, moving Jefferson to resign and return to his estate at Monticello.

When John Adams won the Presidential Election of 1796, he immediately moved to levy new taxes, start a navy, build up the army, and enact the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798 in response to an undeclared naval war with France. Adams used this act in large part to stifle dissent and criticism against his own policies.

Jefferson’s presidency, by contrast, was marked by his belief in agrarianism, states’ rights, and limited government. After winning the Presidential Election of 1800, Jefferson moved to repeal the new taxes, pardoned all political criminals, disbanded most of the Navy, decreased the size of the army, and shrunk the size of the government. These policies led to some problems, however. When British and French ships began impressing American sailors, Jefferson’s only response was to order an embargo, stopping all shipping from American ports. This policy led to terrible inflation, and was highly unpopular. Jefferson never admitted any error on his part. In 1803, Jefferson made a deal with France to buy French Louisiana for $15 million, doubling the size of the fledgling nation, despite controversy over whether the deal he had made was Constitutional. He sent an expedition led by Meriwether Louis and William Clark to explore and chart the new territory.

On political violence, Jefferson wrote, “What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must from time to time be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.”2

Religiously, Jefferson was a deist, as was common among many of the leading intellectuals of the time. According to Avery Cardinal Dulles, a leading Roman Catholic theologian,

“In summary, then, Jefferson was a deist because he believed in one God, in divine providence, in the divine moral law, and in rewards and punishments after death; but did not believe in supernatural revelation. He was a Christian deist because he saw Christianity as the highest expression of natural religion and Jesus as an incomparably great moral teacher. He was not an orthodox Christian because he rejected, among other things, the doctrines that Jesus was the promised Messiah and the incarnate Son of God. Jefferson’s religion is fairly typical of the American form of deism in his day.” (Dulles, 2005)

While publicly, Jefferson’s ideas had given the Americans moral justification to throw off their former government, his private life left a more mixed legacy. The man who had written so much about independence had owned many slaves, and had never freed them upon his death. According to Wikipedia.com,

“Jefferson owned many slaves over his lifetime. Some find it baffling that Thomas Jefferson owned slaves yet was outspoken in saying that slavery was immoral and it should be abolished. Biographers point out that Jefferson was deep in debt and had encumbered his slaves by notes and mortgages; he chose not to free them until he finally was debt-free, which he never was. Jefferson seems to have suffered pangs and trials of conscience as a result.”

In addition, at one time Jefferson had expressed views that blacks by nature were inferior to whites. He later recanted this view, in 1809.

“Sir,–I have received the favor of your letter of August 17th, and with it the volume you were so kind to send me on the “Literature of Negroes”. Be assured that no person living wishes more sincerely than I do, to see a complete refutation of the doubts I have myself entertained and expressed on the grade of understanding allotted to them by nature, and to find that in this respect they are on a par with ourselves. My doubts were the result of personal observation on the limited sphere of my own State, where the opportunity for the development of their genius were not favorable and those of exercising it still less so. I expressed them therefore with great hesitation; but whatever be their degree of talent it is no measure of their rights. Because Sir Isaac Newton was superior to others in understanding, he was not therefore lord of the person or property of others. On this subject they are gaining daily in the opinions of nations, and hopeful advances are making toward their re-establishment on an equal footing with the other colors of the human family. I pray you therefore to accept my thanks for the many instances you have enabled me to observe of respectable intelligence in that race of men, which cannot fail to have effect in hastening the day of their relief; and to be assured of the sentiments of high and just esteem and consideration which I tender to yourself with all sincerity.”

While to many, Jefferson’s legacy may send mixed signals to those who value freedom and equality, upon closer examination, many of his faults were simply based on a lack of understanding, not any malicious desire to gain from the toil and suffering of others. Above all, Jefferson’s based his philosophy upon Enlightenment principles of independence and the power of the mind. Jefferson valued exploration and discovery above all else, which allows one to use to use the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to an end that serves one’s own intellectual and spiritual growth, while spreading education and knowledge among society at large.

Works Cited

1. Peterson, Merrill D. Thomas Jefferson: Writings. 1236.

2. “United States Declaration of Independence.” Wikipedia. 6 Sept. 2007. 6 Sept. 2007 <http://www.wikipedia.com&gt;.

3. “Thomas Jefferson.” Wikipedia. 6 Sept. 2007. 6 Sept. 2007 <http://www.wikipedia.com&gt;.

4. Jefferson, Thomas. “Letter to William Smith.” 13 Nov. 1787.

5. Dulles, Avery Cardinal. “The Deist Minimum.” First Things: a Monthly Journal of Religion and Public Life 149 (2005): 25.

Foxes and Chickens, and Sheep and Psychosis

ConCen Blog Feature

By mothandrust
The Conspiracy Central Blog
Monday, August 20, 2007

There is a quaint old English custom, well until at least until a couple of years back, that entailed ‘upper crust’ twits in red blazers, charging around the countryside on horseback, tooting little brass horns and trying to keep up with a pack of dogs. And if they were really lucky they got to witness a wild (untamed) animal being ripped to pieces by said dogs. Whilst in our current ‘enlightened’ times it is easy to stand aghast or shake one’s head at the idea of seeing such fun as a sport, this process killed a few thousand foxes a year. Tragic of course for the fox (or whatever they got hold of), but, nevertheless, still inherently, survival of the fittest, genetic lines extinguished or evolved (and why no doubt the craftier fox has taken to living off humanity’s waste in suburbia), and, although savage, a swift and natural (albeit engineered) death.

Governments rise and fall, the debate goes on and on, (costing the taxpayers tens of millions), eventually after screams of protest, countless column inches, such practice was banned. Hurrah!

Yet, whilst all this flag waving for animal rights and freedom for foxes occupies the public’s ‘imagination’, HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF CHICKENS ARE BEING TORTURED EVERY WEEK, for the sake of a cheap roast on Sunday or a KFC family bucket. Chickens, pumped full of growth hormone, unable to stand (as their bones fail to develop in line with their flesh), never to see the light of day, to be shoved on a mechanical conveyor, destined to have heads ripped off before ever seeing natural sunlight or feeling breeze ruffling their mangy feathers.

Anyone see a problem here? I do, and it’s about perspective – or, the lack of it. Is it not astounding that people are so easily distracted from the real world by irrelevance and inducement? Perhaps not, but to me it seems, the incapacity of humanity to rationalise lies at the heart of global difficulty. It gives authority carte-blanche to shepherd willing grazers in whatever way they choose using just a few techniques and tricks revolving around our basic drivers, hunger and fear, which of course includes identification, i.e. as a social animal, security through belonging. It is a practice repeated over and over again (religion and nationalism being the two prime examples). Sheep flock to the bidding of threat or inducement, never pondering for one moment the statistical relevance in relation either to their personal security or global perspectives.

We are subjected to a daily bombardment of examples, as the half dozen or so Americans killed during a bridge collapse demonstrates, for while this was being paraded across BBC news headlines, tens of millions were being displaced and thousands drowned in Bangladesh and India. What makes this all the more preposterous is that there are thousands of times more Bangladeshi and Indian residents in the UK than Americans!

Perhaps the greatest example of this inability to rationalise, to perspectivise, for the fear drummed into us, is 11th September 2001. The day, in case anyone has forgotten, when three buildings in New York were demolished and approaching three thousand people lost their lives. It is perhaps worth noting here that many times more people die every day through lack of clean drinking water, or food, or shelter, but who know of it? Who would care? Not sheep, happy to graze on diets of game show get-a-life and mega size family buckets. Gobbling up fear and hunger as it is fed through the airwaves and microwaves. No matter that one is ten times, one hundred times more likely to win the lottery than die through ‘Terrorism’ (hardly terrifying one would suggest) or ten thousand times more likely to die in a road accident. It would be laughable if it were not so tragic.

Terrorism itself is a word for sheep, bleated night and day, yet, in itself, absolutely meaningless. For it is not these so called ‘terrorists’ who create terror, but the media in their reporting and the politicians with their posturing. This, to me, is the greatest irony of all – terror – from were does it come? really? It is not of course from a bunch of towel-heads or sand niggers hiding in mountain caves, in reality it is distributed through cluster bombs and land-mines and depleted uranium and ‘shock and awe’ and polluted rivers, destroyed sewage/water/power networks and vulnerability and poverty and, and, and when you stand back to find a perspective, rationalise the situation, it becomes blazingly obvious, real terror (rather than imagined) comes from the liars and hypocrites squealing “TERRORIST!” in the first place!

Nothing is ever offered in context, so the Palestinians are labelled terrorists despite their daily suffering and humiliation and occupied territories, whilst the sheep hear no more than ‘occupied territories’ and believe Palestinians occupy them, rather than understanding Israel stole them! Indeed, contextualisation is impossible for the tension, hypocrisy, paradox and dichotomy it offers. Again, examples are endemic – take for example the need for capitalism to expand, to have people consume more and more, to make stocks rise and rise, and consider it in relation to destruction of planet-wide resources and consequential/subsequential pollution. The two pull in opposite directions and must therefore never be contextualised.

The question, “Why?” (beyond the label of evil) must never be heard – much less discussed, or discovered. Rationality, perspective, consequence and connection must be entirely expunged from the picture. Ignorance is strength, most particularly for mobilisation. Dumb it down and offer it in boxes but never stack the boxes or put them side by side. Isolate – offer potted, dishonest, useless solutions with gravitas and grandeur, then listen as the sheep bleat in unison, “two legs good, four legs bad” “freedom good, terrorism bad”.

Never must dots be joined. Ignorance is bliss, and that is just how society must be managed – bread and circuses. Anyone considering global suffering, inequality and tension and finding connections to government and/or corporate motivation (that is, markets, resources and power) must themselves be isolated, as if the very process of thinking, or challenging Capitalism, becomes evil in itself.

It is best of course if people know nothing, kept in ignorance from cradle to grave. So what education starts, (with its silly little awards of ‘A’ levels and degrees, proving sheep know absolutely nothing useful, coherent or contextualised), media finishes, with its mindless pap, to hypnotise and lobotomise. The population sits drooling over fabrication and fantasy, ignorant to anything meaningful and terrified by everything unknown, which, beyond their soaps and (ever expanding) stomachs, becomes the whole world.

Those who question, who fight above the pap, who see history and connection, who see motivation and fabrication, who attempt to make sense of the fragmented disorder, who challenge received wisdom, are heaped with scorn and derision and tarred with labels like terrorist, traitor, turncoat or ‘self hating Jew’.

To make a connection between cause and effect, action and reaction, must be condemned, ridiculed, obscured; and sheep, who have dusted at least some of the sleep from their eyes – to discover history beyond text books and reason beyond evil – must be isolated, stifled and accused of psychosis.

But remember dear readers, “it is inherently more psychotic to remember than it is to forget.” (‘Waking Life’)

IPB Image

 

 

 

Adnan Khashoggi, GCN, the Protocols, Alex Jones, and the 9/11 Truth Movement

ConCen Blog Feature

By Mifune
The Conspiracy Central Blog
Monday, July 9, 2007

Adnan Khashoggi is the individual who owns Genesis Communications Network, famous for hosting such heavyweight radio personalities as Alex Jones, self proclaimed “Grandfather of the 9/11 Truth Movement,” and Jeff Rense.

According to a 2004 article by Daniel Hopsicker from MadCow Morning News:

“Info on Khashoggi runs the gamut from the ridiculous to the sinister. To get the serious stuff out of the way first:

Khashoggi was among a number of prominent Arab businessmen, like Khalid Mahfouz, who agreed to continue what have been described by US intelligence officials as “protection payments” to bin Laden at a meeting in Paris in 1998, said London’s Sunday Business Post October 7, 2001.

Even Khashoggi’s guru has CIA connections, we learned: the vastly rich swami has been under official suspicion in the assassination of Indian Premier Rajiv Ghandi, and was even arrested by Indian police for currency fraud.

Adnan Khashoggi revealed: He is wanted in Thailand, where he was convicted for fraud in absentia; is currently being sued, in a major and well-publicized case in Federal Court in Minneapolis for what may turn out to be criminal fraud; reportedly, he is also currently the subject of a massive investigation being conducted by the U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles.

Add to that the recently declassified American intelligence report from 1991 listing the top 100 drug traffickers and associates. It included lawyers, right-wing paramilitary fighters, a Peruvian rebel commander, a Colombian singer, a pre-dead Pablo Escobar, a pre-jailbird Manuel Noriega… and Adnan Khashoggi.”

Further quoting the same article,

“From their base in Tampa Florida, Khashoggi and El Batrawi controlled a network of companies, all using the word “Genesis” in their name. The number of Khashoggi-owned Genesis companies we’ve found keeps growing. There is, or was, Genesis Aviation, Inc., Genesis Aviation II, Genesis Diversified Investments, Genesis Studio and Production Corp., Genesis Media Group, Genesis Properties, Genesis Intermedia; GenesisIntermedia.com.; Genesis Delaware; Genesis Florida… The list, it do go on. And on.”

And then there’s the Genesis Communications Network. There’s actually two of them, seemingly unrelated, but they’re so extremely similar in the fraud department to each other and to “Saudi Genesis” that the relationship appears strongly familial. We’re still uncertain as to how close they all are; kissing cousins, at the very least.

The first GCN is a so-called “patriot” network hosting Alex Jones and Dave Van Kliest, the, ah, the individual fronting for the latest See the Flash extravaganza, advertisements for which are spamming the Internet at a rate that must be causing concern among conservationists of our digital landscape of ‘1’s and ‘ 0’s.’

VanKliest is our pick for Disinfotainer of the Year… an especial honor, considering that there was some fierce competition. Of course, “See the Flash Dave” from the powerhour, like Alex Jones, is part of the GENESIS Communications Network.

As if that weren’t enough, evidence from an investigation into the death of Princess Diana indicates that Dodi Al Fayed was the nephew of none other than Adnan Khashoggi. The following quote is from the blog Shaphan, in a 2006 article entitled “Collision or Collusion:”

Adnan Khashoggi. Not named by Stevens. But he turns up, I think, in the evidence of Richard Tomlinson [p.827]. In 1992 I was working on an operation to recover high-tech weapons from the former Soviet Union. This operation was being conducted in collaboration with a very powerful arms dealer whose exact identity I did not know. When I read the file I discovered that this arms dealer was in very frequent contact with Mr Mohamed Al Fayed. I saw that the MI6 informant supplying this information had a code beginning with P, followed by several numbers. As this source was mentioned several times I tried to find out who it was. It was a Frenchman who was head of security at the Ritz Hotel. Stevens discounts the part about the P source in the Ritz but doesn’t address or dispute the claim about the “very powerful” arms dealer whom Al-Fayed saw ‘very frequently’. Al-Fayed’s first wife Samira, the mother of Dodi Fayed, was Adnan Khashoggi’s sister. According to the Paget Report, Dodi had bought a £130k engagement ring for Diana that afternoon and intended proposing imminently. The Daily Express newspaper [caveat lector] cites an author who alleges that Dodi spoke with his Uncle Adnan (by phone?) on the evening of his death – i.e. they were close. The possibility that princes William and Harry would be spending their adolescent summers in Adnan Khashoggi’s mansion in Monaco would have been motive enough for Edinburgh, Blair and MI6 to act to prevent it, for justifiable reasons of national security.” Shaphan, Collision or Collusion, 19 December, 2006, Revised 8 January, 2007.

To top it all off we have evidence that Khashoggi is connected to former Nazis, the Bilderberg Group, Japanese Yakuza, and President Marcos of the Philippines, famous as a dictator from 1960 to 1982. Quoting from Yeadon and Hawkings’ 2004 book, The Nazi Hydra in America – How America’s Right Wing Politicians are Plunging the Country Into a Fascist Police State,

“The Bilderberg group held its first meeting in 1954. The Bilderberg group was founded by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands and former
officer in the SS.
Bernhard had also worked in I.G. Farben’s notorious NW7 group, which served as spies for the Third Reich. The Prince
is also associated with the Knights of Templar, through its Dutch variety. Bernhard was appointed to govern the Dutch order in 1954.
John Foster Dulles was reported to have been one of the most helpful Americans in establishing the Bilderberg group. Incidentally, in
1954 Dulles testified in favor of a bill designed to return vested enemy assets such as GAF, to their previous owners. From the beginning,
the Bilderberg group had several members of the intelligence community associated with it. Sir Colin Gubbins, Britian’s wartime SOE
head, was a founding member. Walter Bedell Smith was a co-chairman of the group in the US. (644)”

“A partial list of significant events of 1954 follows: After learning about the Japanese treasures in November 1953, Marcos starts digging
for gold in the Philippines.
Fred Meuser, Lockheed’s European Director, transfers to Geneva to live, this event figures in later. The Four-
Power Treaty is signed in Paris to terminate the occupation regime in Germany. Germany joins NATO. Geneva Accord reached regarding
peace between France and Indochina. Additionally, 1954 was the year that Edward Landsdale arrived in Vietnam to take over the opium
trade. The Israeli Mossad and US CIA formed an intelligence “partnership.” Nazi gold was moved from Argentina to the Philippines in
1954 after the Mosad determined it was located in Argentina.
(645)”

One of the earliest documents attesting to Marcos’s recovering the treasure of the Golden Lily is a gold certificate dated 1956. (646)”

Another gold certificate was issued on January 17, 1963 by Unions Bank of Switzerland. The certificate was issued to Adnan Kasogi.
Adnan Kasogi was actually Adnan Khashoggi, a Marcos crony.
Khashoggi’s name was misspelled, but that is often the case in these
certificates. Khashoggi was a Lockheed agent and partner of Yoshio Kodama. Kodama was a Japanese rear admiral during the war and
also a member of the Japanese Yakuza crime clan. Kodama was charged with shipping the loot to the Philippines during the war. This
gold certificate was issued just before Lockheed paid the first known bribe to Prince Bernhard. Lockheed was being used by the CIA to
funnel money worldwide. Moreover, Lockheed’s European Sales Director, Dutchman Fred Meuser, had been a member of Prince
Bernhard’s wartime air force squadron. An additional member of the Lockheed bribe team was CIA officer Nicholas Deak. Deak had
founded a money brokering firm that was used to funnel money to Kodama. Deak’s company later merged with Lionel C. Perera, who
founded the money firm of Perera, Manfra & Brookes. Perera was attached to the Chief of Military Government Finance Office at the
Third Army’s headquarters in Germany at war’s end, where he interviewed Colonel Rauch. Rauch was the SS colonel responsible for
hiding the Reich Bank gold reserves. (646)”

Now just recently, we have a report from the Times Online: Egyptian billionaire ‘who spied for Mossad’ found dead.

Here’s the kicker: Adnan Khashoggi was one of his associates.

An Egyptian billionaire financier who feared for his life after being accused of being a Mossad spy was found dead outside his Mayfair flat yesterday in suspicious circumstances.

Ashraf Marwan, the son-in-law of the late President Gamel Abdel Nasser, was found beneath his fourth-floor flat in Carlton House Terrace.

Police were treating his death as suspicious. Friends of Mr Marwan, a former shareholder in Chelsea Football Club, said that he had feared assassination after being named three years ago as an agent during the Yom Kippur war.

Rumours of his death circulated in London’s Arab community last night. Some believe that he may have taken his life after a serious illness was diagnosed.

Mr Marwan’s death will send shockwaves across the Middle East and among some of Britain’s wealthiest people. His associates included Adnan Khashoggi, the arms dealer, Ken Bates, the football club chairman, the Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi and the late Tiny Rowland.

At this point I would like to broach the subject of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, or as one author, Laura Knight Jadczyk, has called them, The Protocols of the Pathocrats, in her February 2006 editorial by the same title. I agree with her statement:

“In this week’s podcast we discuss what we have identified as the very first problem that must be solved in order for positive changes to be undertaken in American and elsewhere in the world: the Media.

Knowledge is power. Those who control information can control the masses; it’s that simple.

As we researched the subject of the media, we came across The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. As everyone knows, this is a vicious anti-Semitic hoax. We agree. We do not for a minute think that this represents Judaism or ordinary Jewish people.

What was shocking for us was our realization that the Protocols is being implemented almost line by line by many of the members of the Bush Administration and the various government ‘think-tanks’ that formulate their policy. In other words, the Protocols is not a hoax because it is nonsense, but rather it is only a hoax because it was attributed to Jews.

Here, we present the text of Protocol 12 from which several excerpts were read on the podcast and which we jokingly referred to as “The Gospel According to Karl Rove.”

Read it and understand that this is, indeed, the number one issue that America must deal with before they can do a single other thing.”

This is not to say that there are not Zionists involved in the plan to bring about a one world goverment. I would like to focus on one particular portion of Protocol 12, which pertains to control of the press.

“8. Literature and journalism are two of the most important educative forces, and therefore our government will become proprietor of the majority of the journals. This will neutralize the injurious influence of the privately-owned press and will put us in possession of a tremendous influence upon the public mind …. If we give permits for ten journals, we shall ourselves found thirty, and so on in the same proportion. This, however, must in no wise be suspected by the public. For which reason all journals published by us will be of the most opposite, in appearance, tendencies and opinions, thereby creating confidence in us and bringing over to us quite unsuspicious opponents, who will thus fall into our trap and be rendered harmless.

9. In the front rank will stand organs of an official character. They will always stand guard over our interests, and therefore their influence will be comparatively insignificant.

10. In the second rank will be the semi-official organs, whose part it will be to attack the tepid and indifferent.

11. In the third rank we shall set up our own, to all appearance, opposition, which, in at least one of its organs, will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.

12. All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions — aristocratic, republican, revolutionary, even anarchical – for so long, of course, as the constitution exists …. Like the Indian idol “Vishnu” they will have a hundred hands, and every one of them will have a finger on any one of the public opinions as required. When a pulse quickens these hands will lead opinion in the direction of our aims, for an excited patient loses all power of judgment and easily yields to suggestion. Those fools who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will be repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for us. In the vain belief that they are following the organ of their party they will, in fact, follow the flag which we hang out for them.”

In light of all of this, certain questions need to be asked:

  • Can we honestly consider any radio personality broadcasting on GCN to be free of ulterior motives, such as Alex Jones gatekeeping[1] in terms of Mossad connections to 9/11, or steering the 9/11 Truth Movement into ineffectiveness and hyper-emotional states of mind?
  • Can anyone who holds any position of prominence within GCN’s management, be considered free of ulterior motives and/or ties to the rogue network? I’m looking at you, Ted Anderson.
  • I have one more question, which I ask you all to consider deeply: Is the real role of Genesis Communications Network to “present what looks like the very antipodes” to the power elite of the Monolithic and Ruthless Conspiracy?

Don’t answer right away. Just think about it. For those of you who are wondering, I don’t think that Daryl Bradford Smith is much better as a source of information; he covers Zionism, but falls into racism and hate speech. The issue of Zionism must be approached delicately and precisely in order to be fought properly.

__________________________________________________________

Footnotes:

  1. During a broadcast of Infowars on February 18, 2007, Alex Jones made the following statement:

    “Watson: …and the Jewish Conspiracy angle.

    Alex Jones: Now let’s be clear. Neither I, Avery or Fetzer, uh, think it’s an Israeli attack. In fact, they’ve had national polls of people who believe it’s an inside job, 7% believe Israel was involved. “

    The broadcast from which this excerpt was obtained can be downloaded from here. Start listening at 84:30 to hear the exact quote.