The Suspicious and Timely death of Father Anthony de Mello, SJ.

There seems a depressing inevitability about the fate of those who would challenge the established order, and engage popular support. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X come readily to mind, and of course President Kennedy. Undoubtedly people who had made powerful enemies but had also polarised various social, religious and political groups enough to conjure a host of scapegoats and confusion. Where the heavy finger of blame points in only one direction, subtler methods are required.

*

Tony was a rising star in the Catholic Church. OK, at 55 he was no spring chicken, but nevertheless by comparison to the higher orders, he was youthful indeed. Tony founded the Sadhana institute in 1973, which over the years gained an international reputation, along with its founder. Tony found himself frequently jetting around the world giving conferences and talks and gaining ever more popularity with an increasing audience.

Tony captivated audiences with simple stories, parables and sayings from across culture and religion: Chinese, Indian, American, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist… using them as gateways to understanding, windows upon awareness. Moreover, Tony held a deep appreciation for scripture, the messages, signposts held within, and the early Christian mystics whose writings he blended seamlessly with spiritual wisdom, from wherever it came.

Come the mid ’80s, although resistant at first, Tony allowed occasional recordings of his talks. In 1986 he gave his first videoed conference, ‘Wake up to Life!’, held over four days in New York. It was an enormous success, Tony appeared to be going places.

*

I knew nothing of Tony at this time, I’d been C of E and lapsed somewhat. In fact I’d found more sense in Daoism and Buddhism so had focused my spiritual journey there. When it came to Catholicism, my connection, hence understanding, had consisted of little more than, ‘In God’s Name’ by David Yallop (arguing Pope John Paul I was assassinated because he was about to curtail the Vatican Bank’s money laundering for the Mafia and return the Church to the poor), ‘The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail’ by Michael Baigent et al. (which, amongst other things, examines the construction and editing of the Bible and Rome’s attempts at exterminating dissidence), and ‘Father Ted’, so ‘followers of the faith’ were unlikely to be top of my reading list.

Not long after the Internet came into being, a friend who is prone to such things, sent me a quote from Anthony de Mello:

“You are so proud of your intelligence”, said the master. “You are like a condemned man proud of the vastness of his prison cell”.

I liked it very much. It sat comfortably with someone who, at least academically, was intellectually challenged. In fact, it was a great source of comfort as I fought my way through three years of International Relations Theory at university.

Never really thought any more about it after uni, until browsing in a London book store, wanting something for my return journey to Aberystwyth, when I came across ‘Sadhana: a way to God – Christian exercises in Eastern form’. When I read Anthony de Mello was a Jesuit priest I almost retuned the book to the shelf, almost, but… something stayed me. It is important, as I would hear Tony tell me, just a day or so hence, not to let prejudice stain my window.

Sadhana was a joy. To be honest it transformed my picture of what Christianity could be. Tony made such simple, wholesome sense, seamlessly tying east and west. In fact, what Tony was saying, seemed to me the antithesis of Catholicism as I had understood it.

And indeed, although willing to reappraise my opinion, given the shining beacon of Tony, and as I was to discover, some remarkably brave nuns and priests in Latin America, I could find little, or nothing, to substantially challenge my original position. For as I examined recent Papal decisions and actions in relation to censuring and silencing campaigning priests, organised crime, child abuse, financial dealings, power… the actions appeared as autocratic, unanswerable, arbitrary as ever. With the fearsome Herr Ratzinger appearing as Pope John Paul II’s henchman for throttling dissidence.

*

Tony must have been a big, big problem. Tony would not be silenced, he was here to dance his dance. He spoke his truth in a simple, logical, understandable way, engaging with increasing numbers as word spread. His 1986 tour of the US, as mentioned above, was a huge success. Unfortunately, all the video footage of the four day conference was destroyed, leaving just eight hours of audio (of which most would be published as ‘Awareness’ some three years later).

1987, a year on, Tony is back in the States, ready for his summer tour. Surely this year there would be no such accident, backups would be made, safeguards put in place. ‘Tony, the video’ was about to go public through every Catholic bookshop worldwide! A most unpalatable prospect for the powers that be.

*

It would be a futile exercise to attempt to uncover any validity behind the possible assassination of Tony. As a priest within the Jesuit order, he would be effectively encased within their system. Their meals, their autopsy, their press release, no need for external examination. So we see motivation, means and method, but that is all, and as Tony would advise us, one must keep an open mind, open to, and awareness of, each and every possibility and eventuality.

Assassination or not, for Herr Ratzinger, Tony’s death was a timely ‘Godsend’. Unfortunately for Ratzinger, Tony’s work did not dry up. Posthumously published works appeared and interpretations also began to surface. He was not best pleased. On Ratzinger’s request the Vatican banned Tony’s books, however, finding the ban unworkable, this was transmuted to a ‘Notification’, penned by Ratzinger and authorised by Pope John Paul II, placed in all Tony’s books warning Catholics away from such dangerous and subversive teaching.

*

Tony represented a potential schism in the Church, encouraging people to become aware, to think for themselves, rather than let the Church, or any ideology do it for them.

“To doubt”, Tony argues, “is infinitely more important than adoration… to question is so much more important than to believe”.

Everywhere people are searching for objects to adore, but I don’t find people awake enough in their attitudes and convictions. How happy we would be if terrorists would adore their ideology less and question more. However, we don’t like to apply that to ourselves; we think we’re all right and the terrorists are wrong. But a terrorist to you is a martyr to the other side.

The process that we use for making a St. Francis Xavier could be exactly the same process used for producing terrorists.

What is scripture, then? It’s a hint, a clue, not a description. The fanaticism of one sincere believer who thinks he knows causes more evil than the united efforts of two hundred rogues. It’s terrifying to see what sincere believers will do because they think they know. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we had a world where everybody said, “We don’t know”?

Unfortunately Tony’s observations on the scriptures did not survive the accident, but having gone over the eight remaining hours of the ‘Wake up to Life!’ conference tapes times past counting (cutting, splicing, reordering, editing… (it appears as if no one cared for these recordings) a long and would be tedious process, if not for the joy of listening to Tony and his insights) the few biblical observations which did survive paint a remarkably different picture to the one presented as Truth by religious hierarchy.

“Sleeping people read the scriptures and crucify the Messiah on the basis of them.” Tony is not limiting his observation to lay people, but challenging all, citing examples of priests and religious scholars who, through the Bible and enculturation, lose sight of deeper meaning, preferring attachment to understanding.

Awareness, awareness, awareness – the message is so simple, yet complex as life itself. To find awareness one must first shatter illusions, get deprogrammed, remove the control that society has imposed. So what about Tony’s awareness? Tony’s deprogramming? Tony’s society?

One can of course only speculate, and it is most difficult to see that which surrounds us, pervades us (like, to use one of Tony’s analogies, the little fish in the ocean: “Excuse me, I’m looking for the ocean. Can you tell me where I can find it?”), however, from examining Tony’s words, I believe he was under few illusions about Catholicism, and the ruthlessness of its hierarchy.

One might even suggest he was poking fun or taunting them, with all his talk of awareness, understanding, discovery, and not taking the Bible literally, which flies in the face of those with an interest in power and control, who prefer blind obedience and subservience. Further, in his condemnation of religion Tony suggests the Church falls prey to idolatry: a mental idol, producing “the more dangerous idol worshippers”.

“All revelations, however divine, are never any more than a finger pointing to the moon… When the sage points at the moon, all the idiot sees is the finger.” Tony is not of course limiting his observation to Catholicism or Christianity but religion in general and the idols: texts, symbols, rituals, which too often become a “barrier to getting in touch with reality, because sooner or later we forget that the words are not the thing. The concept is not the same as the reality. They’re different… The final barrier to finding God is the word “God” itself and the concept of God.” “You miss God because you think you know. That’s the terrible thing about religion.”

Tony is universally scathing of nations and governments of all kinds, “I don’t know of one government, not one, that is selfless, individuals perhaps, but governments, oh, oh, oh”. Can Tony, in his awareness, be overlooking the government in Rome?

I wondered at his tenacity, fearlessness, abandon, and I am tempted to say foolhardiness, as he jokes, perhaps?, of becoming Pope (edited out of the book), questioning the honesty and capacity of priests and pouring scorn on weeping for one’s sins – “a great religious distraction”, says Tony. “That’s not what repent means: wake up! Become aware! What’s the use of weeping for your sins, which you committed while you were asleep anyway?” But, Tony also informs us, you cannot truly live until you have abandoned fear, and fear of death.

And Tony shows no fear, as he enters into the heat of battle, with his heart at the lotus feet of the Lord (“should I battle my relatives? Go right ahead, do your duty”).

He is not threatened by criticism, he does not care what you think of him or what you say about him. He’s cut all those strings: he’s not a puppet any longer.

“He’s terrifying. So we’ve got to get rid of him. He tells the truth: he has become fearless: he has stopped being human.”

Human! Behold! A human being at last! He broke out of his slavery, broke out of their prison.

This is Tony from ‘wake up to life, 86′. Jesus appeared as the immediate example in my mind, but the more I examined Tony’s words the more I found challenges to Rome, its orthodoxy and references to their potential response. Is it in any way possible that Tony could be blind to the anger his perspective generated amongst Church hierarchy? Or is he predicting his fate?

Tony finishes the conference with his wonderful story of ‘the man who invented fire’, who shared his invention with the cold and hungry and so enraged and terrified the priests that they got rid of him. Again, this could be reference to Jesus, yet it might just as readily apply to the man who rediscovered it.

***

document with references available for download at Scribd

‘Awareness’ by Anthony de Mello, 8 CDs torrent file

other resources at http://awareness.tk

12 Comments

  1. I feel there is something wrong about this man. Deep within the Conspiracy research I found Jesus Christ to be the power to stand against Satan who is in charge of the powers that be, not long did I. Jesus Christ for the first time made so much sense to me, seriously – I’ve been through witchcraft, buddhism, hinduism, taoism and many other things and I always thought Jesus Christ was of that level. You know – as this guy tells you. This Jesuit, who avoids naming Jesus Christ and even goes as far as calling him “this guy Jesus” and puts His truths on the same level as those of pagan religions and general “spiritualism” of “don’t give a fuck”. Anyway, today I listened to this guy for a few hours to check him out. At one point I started trusting him because I know how he thinks, I have lived as he says you should for quite some while – until I found the Next Level, that of Jesus Christ, of God. Shit, and the trouble is that he pulled me down to that darned level of mere happiness, of mere bliss which is so much lower of that level of Christ. And I feel so saddened now for my fresh Love for Christ got swayed in such a silly little way. I know God loves me and will help me get back on track, but I am really dissapointed about this. I should have expected this backstab from a Jesuit who claims to be willing to be the Witch General a.k.a. Pope.
    Be careful, guys! He gives fake liberation, that of self-love, that of Luciferian perspective. Highly dangerous stuff – and you never know it when you’re in it, when you’ve never met Jesus. And I really don’t mean to be “religious”, I am strongly against any authority, but The Creator is just simply above anything in this haughty world and thus remains the Everlasting Teacher which I got separated from today because of re-checking places I know to be unworthy.
    Be blessed, my brothers in arms, this battle is the holy war and we ought to stand by Christ on Gods side.

  2. i guess you’re agreeing with me then Salem, Tony’s words to the church are dangerous and subversive. who, rather than the “Luciferian perspective” of self love (and as a consequence love for all life), demand self hate: guilt and sin, suffering and damnation for all who do not submit to their order, in effect, hate for all life.

    man, that’s some weird fucking god you’ve got there, but more validation i believe for my argument :D thanks,

    jj

  3. Dear mothandrust, you, as all Illuminati brainwash victims, have misunderstood Jesus Christ in complete entirety. Jesus would be the first to burn the churches, the first to damn Vatican to Hell.
    I am saddened by your words because you are an example of another person who will never truly understand what life is about and what the direction of it is.
    As I said, I have been on that poor level of bliss. Of course, it is much, much higher than that of ordinary slave you see wearing a tie or a diamond ring or any of the worldly shit people waste themselves on. Bliss and the “freedom” of what I call Tao is great, but how much infinitely greater is Jesus Christ and God and what They/He has to offer, you don’t realize and also you don’t understand that there is not a bit of guilt involved in true fellowship of Christ and the sin has nothing to do with fear – it is a mentality of a slave to fear God in such a negative way. A true follower of Christ is full of His love, free of bondage to sin and filled with purpose for this life on this sinful, dirty, nasty planet. This world is far from perfect, this blog alone should tell you that “letting yourself go” or “going with the flow” will indoubtedly lure you into the Devils trap,that of Illuminati, that of NWO – and Christ is the only way to remain loving yet to be able to face Satan and fight him.
    I truly hope you will lose your pride in yourself and rise so much higher to reach the truth of Christ.
    God bless you!

  4. Salem, i have no interest in name calling, this “my god is better than your god” is inherently childish. it is also judgemental and Christ says “judge not lest ye be judged”. (there is nothing in this universe that is not a product/part of God, just as nothing is excluded from God’s divine plan.)

    recognise your own ’sin’ but don’t impose that judgement upon others.

    you choose a hierarchical christ idol to which all must be servile, i prefer to empower the christ within.

    quite frankly Salem i’m not interested in a religious discussion with you, i’ve heard it all before. if you want to pick religious fights might i suggest CC’s ‘religion and occult’ forum.

    post on the subject matter or i’ll ignore/delete it.

    Love,

    • mothandrust, I would say something for you to feel reassured that there’s others feeling the same way as you
      but I feel your inner guide and wisdom don’t really need more than this
      good luck to you and your kind
      peace and awareness

  5. HI there, I’d just recently discovered Fr. de Mello’s teachings and got interested in the man, so read a bit about his life and death.
    There is a biography published online by his brother

    http://users.tpg.com.au/adsligol/tony/tony1.html

    who claims they dined together in the canteen of Fordham University on the day Tony died. After dinner Tony complained of “stomach unease” and went to bed. He was found dead the next morning, lying on the floor.
    The bio says nothing about cause of death, or the findings of an autopsy or any other examination. Do you know if there is info about this online?

    While I’m not ruling out any machinations from the Catholic Church, it seems somewhat improbable that, had they been the cause of his death, they would choose to do it in the USA where regulations and a follow-up investigation, I believe, must be way more serious than in India.
    To pioson Tony at the canteen of Fordham University in New York seems to require a vast amount of influence and energy to make all clues disappear. Just doens’t seem likely.

    What are your thoughts?

    • in India Tony was surrounded by friends.

      “Fordham University … was founded by the Roman Catholic Diocese of New York in 1841 as St. John’s College, placed in the care of the Society of Jesus shortly thereafter, and has since become an independent institution under a lay Board of Trustees which describes the university as ‘in the Jesuit tradition’.” (Wikipedia)

      “As a priest within the Jesuit order, he would be effectively encased within their system. Their meals, their autopsy, their press release, no need for external examination”

      so, this would be the perfect place to carry out the assassination. note, there was no public autopsy, as would be required for you or i.

      • IF the law required no public autopsy then yes, it seems convenient. Are you sure this is the case? On what basis would they claim the right for a private autopsy?
        I’m not from the US and I know in my country this would be out of the question.

        Was there ever a formal accusation made by relatives or friends of Tony?

  6. Obviously he was murdered by the modern inquisitors; that is, by the Vatican.

  7. No, he can’t. You’re right. He couldn’t be unaware of the Global Roman Empire in the form of the church institution with its spiritually embedded billion people (Milliarden-Volk) and much much more highly sophisticated power structures within all governments around the world, leading to effective world government since at least 1945 with the second Thirty Years’ “World War” and Hiroshima/Nagasaki.
    Q: “Should I battle my relatives?”
    A: “Go right ahead, do your duty.”
    That’s what Ignatius of Loyola and Eric Jon Phelps are saying exactly the same way.
    “This could be reference to Jesus” OR to the fiery saint in person.
    What an inspiration this article is! Thanks, man.

  8. To me, Anthony de Mello was a “role-model. He was “awaken”, I think. It’s pretty “…uncorfortable to be awaken. We’d rather be fast asleep.” he would say. Why are so many of us so disturbed emotionally to the things he was saying? Is it because it’s true? Why don’t we have the guts to simply accept to ourselves that we do do them (sometimes), huh? We wouldn’t be bothered one bit if we didn’t do the things he was saying that we normally say “upset” us. Does this makes sense to us? This, to me is part of “waking up”. I’ve got a beautiful saying in Spanish (Spain) for this, i.e. “El que se pica, ajos come”, which could loosely be translated into “The one who eats garlic feels hot in their mouth” If you didn’t eat it, you wouldn’t feel the hot spicy taste of it, would you?

  9. tbh Oksana i don’t know, but i can’t find any details, and through history poisoning has been a favoured method of Catholic hierarchy for disposing of undesirables. as far as i know there were no claims from family or friends, or even the wider public at large, but then, all his immediate associates were Catholic, as were the majority of his audience, and as we know, people tend to be blind to that which surrounds them.

    i’m making an observation not an accusation and highlighting how unpleasant the church’s hierarchy found his views and why his death was so timely for them.


Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a comment